his behavior constituted theft sin.
The reporter newspaper correspondent Yuehua Xuan Miao LinaTwo young Yueqing to 35,000 dollars a mobile phone belonging to another illegal transfer of "good number",http://bbs.xykj.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=35713, after the incident, the charges against them how qualitatively caused controversy - what is convicted of theft? Was convicted of fraud?
Yesterday afternoon, the Court of First Instance Yueqing final conviction for theft, the concern of Zhejiang's first mobile phone theft "good number" profit transfer case temporarily concluded.
Even five phone numbers,christian louboutin outlet,http://www.plpiano.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=109327, sold 35,000 yuan
"Brother, now a good phone number can be valuable, we also sell to get hold to sell, get some money flower." Last June, Yueqing Ni and Di for a playing a mobile phone "good number" of the idea.
June 14, Di online search to a certain number of 136 ××× 55555 phone five even numbers. So with a certain Di Ni discuss, the two decided to hang the phone number in the online sale.
Soon, the Internet was not even five Buying this number.
"My cell phone number in there more than 4000 yuan bill, a price 35,000 yuan,http://www.caogen17.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=6127, do you want?" After some negotiations,nike air max pas cher,http://bbs.wansecheng.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=677650, Ni and Di a certain agreement with the buyer Yumou to 35,000 yuan trading price of the phone number.
The next day at noon, a Ni Liu Yueqing town to the station side and meet Mou, Mou and identity information provided by telephone reported to Di certain. Because Di know a certain hypermarkets staff Liu Yueqing municipal job number and password mobile platform, Di original owner of a fast mobile number 136 ××× 55555 illegal transfer to Mou, Mou 35,air jordan discount,000 after verification yuan to Ni a.
After the incident,louboutin femme pas cher, some Ni and Di have been returned to a Yumou 35,000 yuan.
They committed a crime? Qualitative controversial charges
Case may sound very simple, but in fact very complex. The biggest controversy is about the defendant's criminal conduct qualitative.
Prosecutor accused is guilty of fraud, theft prosecution allegations.
Prosecutors said: Ni certain, they are not certain to conceal the number of holders of Di, nor the identity of the cell phone store staff to sell to the buyer's phone number, cell phone number so that buyers and trading sources generate misconceptions misconception that the number has been made himself so pay 35,000 yuan to two. Therefore,http://www.17961.com/thread-63861-1-1.html, you can determine for alleged fraud in the amount of 3.5 million yuan. And the phone number there are nearly 5,000 original bill should be identified as the alleged theft amount.
But in the course of the trial, made a defender Ni,http://www.bibo.asia/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=20464, Ni argued that the allegations guilty of fraud and theft in a lack of legal basis, the behavior of a Ni does not have the constituent elements of fraud, and at the time of the transaction did not know the phone Cary calls, and no common theft, intentional that Ni certain innocence.
And a counsel argued Di, Di certain behavior is a behavior violated two counts of theft because the standard weight for filing fraud, it should choose a felony, that is theft, theft amounts to less than 5,000 yuan in the conviction and sentencing .
Court for "theft" convicted of fraud found not guilty
The two sides had a heated debate control debate in court.
Finally, after a judge finds that a Ni, Di certain illegal possession for the purpose of taking secret means to steal another person's mobile phone number and memory calls, and be sold, the proceeds of stolen goods 35,http://onigdesign.com/error.html,000 yuan,louboutin homme pas cher, a huge amount, his behavior constituted theft sin.
Judge this explanation is: two others accused the mobile phone number and stored calls sold, after the theft of stolen goods behavior, not fraud, accused of two counts of theft of a crime should be identified, so the prosecutor accused the defendants others who steal the phone number to be sold after the conduct constituted fraud,http://www.163sy.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=754373, not guilty.
Given the offense is committed when a defendant Di minors, two defendants have taken the initiative after the incident stolen money back clear, so the defendant Ni and Di certain to be a mitigated punishment, then made the decision.
页:
[1]
